W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > June 2015

Media Capture Task Force potential new work items (was: TPAC 2015 Registration Now Open)

From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:27:27 +0000
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>, Chia-Hung Tai <ctai@mozilla.com>
Message-ID: <D8C30760-7A1A-4941-9C9F-56CF1843CF03@intel.com>
[+cc CTai]

Hi Chairs, Dom, All, CTai,

> On 12 Jun 2015, at 12:08, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
> WebRTC WG is scheduled for Thursday and Friday, because many
> participants will continue on to the IETF meeting the week after (also
> in Japan).


> Den 12. juni 2015 08:55, skrev Kostiainen, Anssi:
>> Should we now expect the Media Capture Task Force to meet on Thursday and Friday during the TPAC week (as usual)? I saw a bunch of +1 as a response to the proposal [1], but no explicit decision (or I managed to miss it).
> We hope that the main work of the Media Capture TF (Media Capture and
> Streams) will be done by then.
> We still have other Media Capture Task Force items to complete:
> - MediaStream Recording
> - MediaStream Image Capture
> - Media Capture Depth Stream Extensions
> - Media Capture from DOM Elements
> - Audio output devices API
> - Screen Capture
> Some of these might be finished.
> I'm thinking that we will divide the time as needed between WebRTC and
> Media Capture, but don't want to speculate this early on how the split
> needs to be done.

To add to that Media Capture TF list, I think there might also be some new work items that could fit into the TF scope and benefit from F2F discussion. With that, I agree it makes sense to look at the split closer to the meeting.

A concrete example of potential new work items: the VideoWorker and ImageBitmap extensions proposals by Mozilla [2] (as a response to [3]) received positive signals from group participants. We, the Depth Stream Extensions editors, have looked at these proposals in more detail and think these APIs would fit in nicely from the technical perspective.

Cc'd CTai for more information on the spec status, and potential plan to propose VideoWorker and ImageBitmap extensions for standardization.

Chairs, Dom - what would be the preferred process and steps to get new work started in this Task Force?



>> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2015Mar/0013.html

[2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2015Apr/0024.html
[3] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2015Apr/0007.html
Received on Friday, 12 June 2015 11:28:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:33 UTC