- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:49:23 +0000
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 10/02/15 12:52, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> Jan-Ivar raised the following issue in the tracker:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues/128
>
> The construct under discussion is this:
>
> var constraints=
> {
> width: {min: 640, ideal: 1280},
> height: {min: 480, ideal: 720},
> advanced: [{width: 1920, height: 1280},
> {aspectRatio: 1.3333333333}]
> };
>
>
> The question is: are the bare values in "advanced" intended as "exact"
> or "ideal"?
>
> If "ideal", the algorithm needs to specify how to deal with multiple
> "ideal" values for the same list of constraints - which one applies?
>
> If "exact" (which was clearly intended by the example originally), the
> algorithm needs to specify that bare values are exact in one context and
> ideal in the other. Dom has a pull request doing this here, with some
> discussion:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/pull/132
>
> Before we fixate on exact text, it seems good to verify what the WG wants.
> Are we happy to see bare values mean "ideal" in top level and "exact" in
> "advanced"?
(contributor hat) yes.
>
> Harald
>
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2015 12:49:50 UTC