- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:51:05 +0100
- To: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2015 11:51:36 UTC
Jan-Ivar raised the following issue in the tracker: https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues/128 The construct under discussion is this: var constraints= { width: {min: 640, ideal: 1280}, height: {min: 480, ideal: 720}, advanced: [{width: 1920, height: 1280}, {aspectRatio: 1.3333333333}] }; The question is: are the bare values in "advanced" intended as "exact" or "ideal"? If "ideal", the algorithm needs to specify how to deal with multiple "ideal" values for the same list of constraints - which one applies? If "exact" (which was clearly intended by the example originally), the algorithm needs to specify that bare values are exact in one context and ideal in the other. Dom has a pull request doing this here, with some discussion: https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/pull/132 Before we fixate on exact text, it seems good to verify what the WG wants. Are we happy to see bare values mean "ideal" in top level and "exact" in "advanced"? Harald
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2015 11:51:36 UTC