W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > February 2015

Re: Screen sharing function name

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:57:40 +0100
Message-ID: <54D9F234.1060200@alvestrand.no>
To: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 02/09/2015 11:22 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 10 February 2015 at 04:28, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> wrote:
>> getX and requestY?  Why not just use "get" for both, ie getScreenShare()?
> Because one can have a persistent grant and can thus be a simple
> retrieval operation.  The other is always a request.
Did I miss something?

I don't see that in the current specification

In particular, I would be surprised to see an application running with 
elevated permissions (I translate this mentally to "installed 
application", but I guess that's only one instance of such things) cause 
an user interaction request before grabbing a surface.

Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2015 11:58:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:32 UTC