bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
- [Bug 27077] Cababilities need to clearly specify that they are constant over time
- [Bug 26954] DeviceID, kind and label needs to be aligned with capabilities.
- [Bug 25771] Explanation of constraints in GUM call
- [Bug 26017] CaptureStream should be specified
- [Bug 26939] Information returned on MediaStreamTrack ended event
- [Bug 26017] CaptureStream should be specified
- [Bug 26937] Proposal: Only allow authenticated origins to access getUserMedia
- [Bug 26939] Information returned on MediaStreamTrack ended event
Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Harald Alvestrand
- Fwd: Reminder, survey closes 16-Nove - Re: Your feedback on TPAC2014 is welcome
- Re: [Bug 26017] CaptureStream should be specified
- Re: Capabilities vs SupportedConstraints
- Re: Capabilities vs SupportedConstraints
Jan-Ivar Bruaroey
- Re: [Bug 26017] CaptureStream should be specified
- Re: Capabilities vs SupportedConstraints
- Re: Capabilities vs SupportedConstraints
- Re: Capabilities vs SupportedConstraints
- Re: Capabilities vs SupportedConstraints
- Re: Capabilities vs SupportedConstraints
Josh Soref
Mandyam, Giridhar
Martin Thomson
- File streaming for gUM
- Re: Capabilities vs SupportedConstraints
- Review of gUM, intro parts
- Re: ConstrainablePattern on remote streams?
Philippe Joseph Cohen
Rob Manson
- Re: Capabilities vs SupportedConstraints
- Re: Capabilities vs SupportedConstraints
- Re: ConstrainablePattern on remote streams?
- Capabilities vs SupportedConstraints