- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:06:19 -0800
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
Thanks for focusing down after my rambling rant! On 11/04/2014 03:40 PM, Rob Manson wrote: > I think there's 2 questions here. > > 1. Should the language be made more explicit > > My vote here is +1 Mine too. No matter what the spec says, it needs to say it clearly. > > 2. Should we change the structure as part of this tidy up > > I'm all for this change (and think the discussion above has raised > some key points worth considering), but my primary goal is making sure > that the language of the API and the spec is more understandable in > this area. I still don't agree with Jan-Ivar about merging the two concepts "supported by UA" and "supported by device" - I'd be much happier with using different words for them, if that makes it clearer. With "supported by UA", I mean "UA will recognize the dictionary key". With "supported by device", I mean "device will be affected by changes to this property". Those may be better words. -- Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2014 22:07:03 UTC