W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > November 2014

Re: [Bug 26017] CaptureStream should be specified

From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 08:35:12 +0000
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1D0BA2FD@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
On 11/11/14 20:52, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> On 11/11/2014 11:06 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
>> On 11/11/14 16:31, bugzilla@jessica.w3.org wrote:
>>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26017
>>>
>>> Jan-Ivar Bruaroey [:jib] <jib@mozilla.com> changed:
>>>
>>>              What    |Removed                     |Added
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>                    CC|                            |jib@mozilla.com
>>>
>>> --- Comment #4 from Jan-Ivar Bruaroey [:jib] <jib@mozilla.com> ---
>>> Hmm, where should issues for that go then?
>>>
>>> Rather than closing it, isn't there another component we can use?
>> There is no component for that spec, and I think we're leaning towards
>> not using bugzilla either (but use github issues instead).
>>
>> Anyway, to me the bug mostly said "spec this up" and now we have a
>> document to do so, so I'm not sure we need the bug or issue any more.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Let's use the github issues list on the new repository.

Yes, and let's make sure that whenever an issue that is not trivial is 
reported there is also a note sent to the list (to my understanding we 
don't have the automatic list notification when issues are filed in 
place yet) so that everyone is aware.


Received on Thursday, 13 November 2014 08:35:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:31 UTC