RE: [Bug 25773] Calling stop should generate ended event

> From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com]
> Sent: den 19 maj 2014 04:05
> To: public-media-capture@w3.org
> Cc: public-media-capture@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [Bug 25773] Calling stop should generate ended event
> 
> On 18 May 2014 08:02,  <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org> wrote:
> > yah - I think that 25248 came to the wrong conclusion. It's really nice to be
> > able to have the same clean up code regardless of how it ended.
> 
> I think that I've been arguing toward the same conclusion as Cullen.
> It's much easier to reason about a state machine if all the
> transitions act the same.  It is also far more convenient. that way.

Are you then arguing for the stop() method to just schedule a stop or should the track still be ended on the next line of code?

/Adam

Received on Monday, 19 May 2014 02:11:39 UTC