Re: [Bug 25773] Calling stop should generate ended event from Martin Thomson on 2014-05-19 (public-media-capture@w3.org from May 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 19:26:12 -0700
To: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
Cc: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXCHD3T2Pr8_SxRGhXNNa5mckYkQtnLfZZafa=Oqfhexg@mail.gmail.com>

On 18 May 2014 19:11, Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Are you then arguing for the stop() method to just schedule a stop or should the track still be ended on the next line of code?


Yes, I think that when Nils raised the issue, this was the conclusion
we came to.

Received on Monday, 19 May 2014 02:26:39 UTC