On 03/24/2014 04:35 PM, Mandyam, Giridhar wrote: > > Ø Sorry, re-reading your post I see you said "avoid any UA-introduced > processing delay". I hope you meant driver, or my answer makes no sense. > > > > Actually -- no, I did not mean driver. I don't expect the UA to be > able to be able to detect any kind of post-processing in the driver, > and a static table may not work in this case anyways as drivers can be > dynamically installed or replaced. But your answer is also valid, > just for a different situation. > I don't understand what point is being discussed here - the API model doesn't expose any distinction between the UA and the driver, so this is (in my opinion) an internal implementation matter.
Received on Monday, 24 March 2014 18:45:30 UTC