Re: Constraints 2014

On 3/24/14 1:52 PM, Jim Barnett wrote:
> For an example of back-off of tied constraints:
>
> {
>   "mandatory":  {...
>   },
>   "optional":  [{
>     "aspectRatio":  15/6
>     "width": 500
>  },  {
>      "aspectRatio": 4/3
>       "width":  400
>   }]
> }

I'm surprised. Missing commas aside, there's still text in the spec that 
suggests this is not valid: 
http://dev.w3.org/2011/webrtc/editor/getusermedia.html#methods-3 says:
> 5. For each constraint key-value pair in the "optional" sequence of 
> the constraints that are for the current media type, in order,
>     1. If the constraint is not supported by the browser, skip it and 
> continue with the next constraint.

Where does the spec spell out that multiple key-value pairs in each 
optional array entry are now allowed?

I suppose sequence<ConstraintSet>, but with ConstraintSet being 
object... this is subtle to say the least.

.: Jan-Ivar :.