- From: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:42:29 -0400
- To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, public-media-capture@w3.org
- Message-ID: <53303645.2010305@mozilla.com>
On 3/23/14 3:41 PM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > On 03/21/2014 03:37 PM, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: >> On 3/21/14 9:07 AM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: >>> Added native settings to tracks. >> >> Use-case please? Where was this discussed? It is unclear what this is >> intended to solve. >> >> Looking at the language for getNativeSettings(), I have concerns >> about this API: " Note that both the track settings and the native >> settings are snapshots and can change without application involvement." >> >> Native settings that can change. Are we supposed to poll reactively >> for changes to "native" settings after we've already gotten the wrong >> thing? That seems awfully late. I would think that what's native >> about any source (or anything) would be almost entirely >> deterministic, and discoverable ahead of time, with something like >> getCapabilities(). >> >> So if anything, I think we're extending in the wrong place here. >> >> I am, however, impressed by how this got in here so expediently. ;-) > > Just to un-impress you a bit :-) .... this is an attempt to put down a > concrete implementation of an understanding some of us reached at > discussions at the Berlin IETF, July 2013. > > The understanding was that there may be times where an app needs to > know what the state of the underlying source was, independent of the > properties of the tracks it's producing. I'm not sure how real that > need is, but we agreed at that time to try to express it in some > fashion; this is the first attempt. OK so it hasn't been discussed here then? I'm happy to discuss: I read two questions in your statement, what the need is, and by when is it useful to have this information? Also, I am still impressed. :-) Having a "first attempt" land in the spec no doubt makes for easier discussion - if any were to surface here - but I trust prudence is now taken to remove it again, if need be, based on lack of support, not lack of opposition. > -- > Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark. .: Jan-Ivar :.
Received on Monday, 24 March 2014 13:42:55 UTC