- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:15:11 +0000
- To: Jan-Ivar Bruaroey <jib@mozilla.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 24/03/14 14:43, Jan-Ivar Bruaroey wrote: > On 3/23/14 3:41 PM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >> >> Just to un-impress you a bit :-) .... this is an attempt to put down a >> concrete implementation of an understanding some of us reached at >> discussions at the Berlin IETF, July 2013. >> >> The understanding was that there may be times where an app needs to >> know what the state of the underlying source was, independent of the >> properties of the tracks it's producing. I'm not sure how real that >> need is, but we agreed at that time to try to express it in some >> fashion; this is the first attempt. > > OK so it hasn't been discussed here then? I'm happy to discuss: I read > two questions in your statement, what the need is, and by when is it > useful to have this information? > > Also, I am still impressed. :-) Having a "first attempt" land in the > spec no doubt makes for easier discussion - if any were to surface here > - but I trust prudence is now taken to remove it again, if need be, > based on lack of support, not lack of opposition. I don't think this specific piece is any different from the rest of the things we're as a group defining. We discuss, solutions are drafted, we discuss some more, and (hopefully) end up at consensus on what should be in the Working Group draft. > >> -- >> Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark. > > .: Jan-Ivar :. >
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2014 07:15:36 UTC