Re: Extending MediaRecorder to record from Web Audio node faster than real time?

Is a MediaStream (and Recorder) going to be happy about having its number
of channels changed in mid-stream?


On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
wrote:

> On 08/27/2014 03:35 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
>> BTW as far as "details to be worked out", I don't think there's anything
>> new here to figure out (although there is a bit more text to write). "new
>> MediaRecorder(audioNode)" should behave almost exactly like "var dest =
>> audioNode.context.createMediaStreamDestination();
>> audioNode.connect(dest); new MediaRecorder(dest.stream);". The only edge
>> case I can think of is handling ChannelSplitterNode.
>>
>
> If it should behave "almost exactly like", can we define it to behave
> "exactly like"?
>
> Including a possible error exception when encountering ChannelSplitterNode?
>
> If there are two ways of doing the same thing, I'd like to have completely
> consistent behaviour rather than "almost consistent behaviour".
>
>
>
>> Rob
>> --
>> oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
>> owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
>> osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
>> owohooo
>> osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o
>> oioso
>> oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo
>> owohooo
>> osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro
>> ooofo
>> otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.
>>
>
>
>