- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:26:59 +0200
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 08/27/2014 03:35 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > BTW as far as "details to be worked out", I don't think there's > anything new here to figure out (although there is a bit more text to > write). "new MediaRecorder(audioNode)" should behave almost exactly > like "var dest = audioNode.context.createMediaStreamDestination(); > audioNode.connect(dest); new MediaRecorder(dest.stream);". The only > edge case I can think of is handling ChannelSplitterNode. If it should behave "almost exactly like", can we define it to behave "exactly like"? Including a possible error exception when encountering ChannelSplitterNode? If there are two ways of doing the same thing, I'd like to have completely consistent behaviour rather than "almost consistent behaviour". > > Rob > -- > oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo > owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo > osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo > owohooo > osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o > o‘oRoaocoao,o’o oioso > oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo > oaonoyooonoeo owohooo > osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono > odoaonogoeoro ooofo > otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2014 15:27:34 UTC