W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > August 2014

Re: Extending MediaRecorder to record from Web Audio node faster than real time?

From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:26:59 +0200
Message-ID: <53FDF8C3.5040504@alvestrand.no>
To: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 08/27/2014 03:35 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> BTW as far as "details to be worked out", I don't think there's 
> anything new here to figure out (although there is a bit more text to 
> write). "new MediaRecorder(audioNode)" should behave almost exactly 
> like "var dest = audioNode.context.createMediaStreamDestination(); 
> audioNode.connect(dest); new MediaRecorder(dest.stream);". The only 
> edge case I can think of is handling ChannelSplitterNode.

If it should behave "almost exactly like", can we define it to behave 
"exactly like"?

Including a possible error exception when encountering ChannelSplitterNode?

If there are two ways of doing the same thing, I'd like to have 
completely consistent behaviour rather than "almost consistent behaviour".

> Rob
> -- 
> oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
> owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
> osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo 
> owohooo
> osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o 
> o‘oRoaocoao,o’o oioso
> oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo 
> oaonoyooonoeo owohooo
> osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono 
> odoaonogoeoro ooofo
> otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.
Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2014 15:27:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:29 UTC