W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > October 2013

Re: Proposed new text for noaccess

From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 08:40:29 +0100
Message-ID: <526E14ED.8000906@ericsson.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
CC: "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2013-10-28 07:50, Adam Bergkvist wrote:
> On 2013-10-27 22:02, Martin Thomson wrote:
>> On 26 October 2013 15:25, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
>>> I would actually prefer an error callback or an exception - the
>>> programmer made an error, the application should do something
>>> exceptional.
>> The problem is that this ISN'T an error, it's just part of the normal
>> business of writing the app.
>> I WANT to have the stream added and negotiated, because - failing some
>> sort of circumstances out of my control - I expect the user to grant
>> permission really soon now.  And I want to ensure that, when they do,
>> the session can actually proceed.
> Is this one intended use-case of "no-access" tracks? I thought we had
> constructable tracks (without initial source) for this.

"without initial source" is perhaps not the best wording. If a sourceId 
was provided, it should be more like "without granted source".

Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 07:40:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:20 UTC