- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:08:09 +0100
- To: public-media-capture@w3.org
On 10/28/2013 07:50 AM, Adam Bergkvist wrote: > On 2013-10-27 22:02, Martin Thomson wrote: >> On 26 October 2013 15:25, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> >> wrote: >>> I would actually prefer an error callback or an exception - the >>> programmer made an error, the application should do something >>> exceptional. >> >> The problem is that this ISN'T an error, it's just part of the normal >> business of writing the app. >> >> I WANT to have the stream added and negotiated, because - failing some >> sort of circumstances out of my control - I expect the user to grant >> permission really soon now. And I want to ensure that, when they do, >> the session can actually proceed. This is an important consideration: Whether a track's access provisions can be changed after creation. If it can be changed (especially if the constraint can be removed and replaced), I have issues. > > Is this one intended use-case of "no-access" tracks? I thought we had > constructable tracks (without initial source) for this. At the moment, we don't have a complete proposal that makes constructable tracks usable. Until we have that, I don't want to argue from that basis. -- Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 12:08:44 UTC