Re: Proposed new text for noaccess

On 2013-10-27 22:02, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 26 October 2013 15:25, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
>> I would actually prefer an error callback or an exception - the
>> programmer made an error, the application should do something exceptional.
>
> The problem is that this ISN'T an error, it's just part of the normal
> business of writing the app.
>
> I WANT to have the stream added and negotiated, because - failing some
> sort of circumstances out of my control - I expect the user to grant
> permission really soon now.  And I want to ensure that, when they do,
> the session can actually proceed.

Is this one intended use-case of "no-access" tracks? I thought we had 
constructable tracks (without initial source) for this.

/Adam

Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 06:51:01 UTC