W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > August 2013

Re: RECAP: Conclusion: Cloning and sharing of MediaStreamTracks - worth it?

From: Tommy Widenflycht <tommyw@google.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:04:19 +0200
Message-ID: <CALLKCfP9FHXo54xU4xTQJ1sZqoPTkXvk2vM2GgBhHUU8uvGCEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Chromium have made some design decisions which assumes that a MST can only
belong to one MS but that is not the reason for bringing this up. It's part
of the process to have to rewrite code as the spec evolves and from an
implementation view I don't see that one is harder to implement that the

I just saw a major change in described behavior and could not find any
compelling reasons why that was made.


On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <
stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:

> But if there are difficulties to implement support for allowing a MST to
> belong to more than one MS, of course that is something we must consider.
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2013 13:04:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:18 UTC