W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-capture@w3.org > August 2013

Re: RECAP: Conclusion: Cloning and sharing of MediaStreamTracks - worth it?

From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:20:57 +0000
To: Tommy Widenflycht <tommyw@google.com>
CC: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1447FA0C20ED5147A1AA0EF02890A64B1C37FC92@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
On 2013-08-21 15:04, Tommy Widenflycht wrote:
> Chromium have made some design decisions which assumes that a MST can
> only belong to one MS but that is not the reason for bringing this up.
> It's part of the process to have to rewrite code as the spec evolves and
> from an implementation view I don't see that one is harder to implement
> that the other.

OK. The "ease-of-implementation" factor was mentioned last time this 
discussion was up [1] - and I (wrongly) assumed it still was valid.

[1] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2013May/0081.html


>
> I just saw a major change in described behavior and could not find any
> compelling reasons why that was made.
>
> /Tommy
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK
> <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com
> <mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     But if there are difficulties to implement support for allowing a MST to
>     belong to more than one MS, of course that is something we must
>     consider.
>


Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2013 13:44:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:26:18 UTC