- From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:20:57 +0000
- To: Tommy Widenflycht <tommyw@google.com>
- CC: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-media-capture@w3.org" <public-media-capture@w3.org>
On 2013-08-21 15:04, Tommy Widenflycht wrote: > Chromium have made some design decisions which assumes that a MST can > only belong to one MS but that is not the reason for bringing this up. > It's part of the process to have to rewrite code as the spec evolves and > from an implementation view I don't see that one is harder to implement > that the other. OK. The "ease-of-implementation" factor was mentioned last time this discussion was up [1] - and I (wrongly) assumed it still was valid. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-capture/2013May/0081.html > > I just saw a major change in described behavior and could not find any > compelling reasons why that was made. > > /Tommy > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK > <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com > <mailto:stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>> wrote: > > > But if there are difficulties to implement support for allowing a MST to > belong to more than one MS, of course that is something we must > consider. >
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2013 13:44:50 UTC