Re: API Spec Transition

Hi Joakim, 

unfortunately, i was not able to join the meeting due to a meeting of our eu project (since i lead a very central work package, i could not join). Thank you for suggesting the three options, let me comment them.

> 	1. Stay in CR and have another implementation (Browser side)

Who will implement it? I have no free resources for this task.

> 	2. Make the implementation interoperable. But before writing adaptor code we have to verify it's a valid option (check with TIM).

Same problem as above.

> 	3. Splitting the API spec and push one operation mode to REC.


+1 if nobody else is able to work on an implementation.

I am available next Tuesday for a call, but i think Werner has already sent possible dates for a call in former emails (11th and 12th of October).

Cheers.
_____________________________
Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier
Chair of Distributed Information Systems
University of Passau
Innstr. 43
94032 Passau

Room 248 ITZ

Tel.: +49 851 509 3063
Fax: +49 851 509 3062

http://twitter.com/fstegmai
http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/florian-stegmaier/
_____________________________

Am 02.10.2012 um 13:47 schrieb Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>:

> Hi,
> During the teleconf [1] today we suggested three ways forward for the API specification:
> 
> 
> 
> We need to have the API editors present for this call. Please let us know if you are available next Tuesday?
> 
> Rgds
> /JS
> 
> [1]  http://www.w3.org/2012/10/02-mediaann-minutes.html
>