Re: Schema.org mapping table

Jean Pierre,
Your revised version of the mapping table for schema.org is published at

http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/additional-mappings.html

Thierry

Le 30/03/2012 09:13, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
> I am resending the file.
>
> BTW, I did CTRL-F5 ;--) The one I see is not the one attached.
>
> Sorry about this.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jean-Pierre
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Evain, Jean-Pierre [mailto:evain@ebu.ch]
> Sent: vendredi, 30. mars 2012 09:10
> To: 'tmichel@w3.org'
> Cc: mcsuarez@fi.upm.es; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Schema.org mapping table
>
> Hi Thierry,
>
> I am not sure it is the latest one as they should be more mappings to contributor.
>
> Let me check if I sent the right one.
>
> Jean-Pierre
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: vendredi, 30. mars 2012 08:41
> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Cc: mcsuarez@fi.upm.es; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Schema.org mapping table
>
> Jean Pierre,
>
> Your revised version of the mapping table for schema.org is published at
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/additional-mappings.html
>
> Thank you,
>
> Thierry.
>
>
>
> Le 28/03/2012 20:29, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
>> Dear Thierry,
>>
>> Please find a revised version of the mapping table for schema.org.
>>
>> Mari-Carmen sent me her comments but I must admit that I can't agree with most :--( e.g.
>>
>> - encodingFormat should map to relation and not to compression or the equivalent of a wrapper as I originally suggested
>> - or add contentRating to rating when the schema.org semantics clearly point to parentalGuidance mapping
>> - or TVSeries or TVSeason are not collections
>> - or only map contributor (and not actor, producer, etc.)
>> - Etc.
>>
>> Putting all these comments in the table would make it very messy.
>>
>> I therefore proposed to Mari-Carmen that she forwards her comments to the group for review in a webex, one by one. However, she reminded me of populating the mapping accuracy column as well as the datatypes, which I have now done.
>>
>> This gave me the opportunity to review the table and I have identified missing mappings. I have also removed the CreativeWork root in the expressions as ma-ont obviously describe a media content equivalent to a CreativeWork.  Several contributors roles are repeated in different schema.org branches like in Movie or MusicRecording or TVEpisode or even TVSeries and TVSeason.
>>
>> The revised table is attached and still need to be review against the comments from Mari-Carmen.
>>
>> Sorry I couldn't do more on Mari-Carmen comments but I have invited her to share these comments with the group and I am looking for the opportunity to discuss them one by one in the group.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Jean-Pierre
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
>> Sent: mardi, 27. mars 2012 14:09
>> To: mcsuarez@fi.upm.es
>> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Subject: Schema.org mapping table
>>
>> Mari-Carmen,
>>
>> Jean Pierre has provided an initial schema.org mapping table to
>> complement our Ontology spec.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/additional-mappings.html
>>
>> As you had volunteer to collaborate to this work, could you please look
>> at it and finalize it ?
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> **************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
>> **************************************************
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
> **************************************************
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
> **************************************************

Received on Friday, 30 March 2012 07:30:01 UTC