RE: Schema.org mapping table

I am resending the file.

BTW, I did CTRL-F5 ;--) The one I see is not the one attached.

Sorry about this.

Thanks in advance,

Best regards,

Jean-Pierre

-----Original Message-----
From: Evain, Jean-Pierre [mailto:evain@ebu.ch] 
Sent: vendredi, 30. mars 2012 09:10
To: 'tmichel@w3.org'
Cc: mcsuarez@fi.upm.es; public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: RE: Schema.org mapping table

Hi Thierry,

I am not sure it is the latest one as they should be more mappings to contributor.

Let me check if I sent the right one.

Jean-Pierre

-----Original Message-----
From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] 
Sent: vendredi, 30. mars 2012 08:41
To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
Cc: mcsuarez@fi.upm.es; public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: Schema.org mapping table

Jean Pierre,

Your revised version of the mapping table for schema.org is published at

http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/additional-mappings.html


Thank you,

Thierry.



Le 28/03/2012 20:29, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
> Dear Thierry,
>
> Please find a revised version of the mapping table for schema.org.
>
> Mari-Carmen sent me her comments but I must admit that I can't agree with most :--( e.g.
>
> - encodingFormat should map to relation and not to compression or the equivalent of a wrapper as I originally suggested
> - or add contentRating to rating when the schema.org semantics clearly point to parentalGuidance mapping
> - or TVSeries or TVSeason are not collections
> - or only map contributor (and not actor, producer, etc.)
> - Etc.
>
> Putting all these comments in the table would make it very messy.
>
> I therefore proposed to Mari-Carmen that she forwards her comments to the group for review in a webex, one by one. However, she reminded me of populating the mapping accuracy column as well as the datatypes, which I have now done.
>
> This gave me the opportunity to review the table and I have identified missing mappings. I have also removed the CreativeWork root in the expressions as ma-ont obviously describe a media content equivalent to a CreativeWork.  Several contributors roles are repeated in different schema.org branches like in Movie or MusicRecording or TVEpisode or even TVSeries and TVSeason.
>
> The revised table is attached and still need to be review against the comments from Mari-Carmen.
>
> Sorry I couldn't do more on Mari-Carmen comments but I have invited her to share these comments with the group and I am looking for the opportunity to discuss them one by one in the group.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jean-Pierre
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: mardi, 27. mars 2012 14:09
> To: mcsuarez@fi.upm.es
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Schema.org mapping table
>
> Mari-Carmen,
>
> Jean Pierre has provided an initial schema.org mapping table to
> complement our Ontology spec.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/additional-mappings.html

>
> As you had volunteer to collaborate to this work, could you please look
> at it and finalize it ?
>
>
> Best,
>
> Thierry
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
> **************************************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************