- From: Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:30:26 +0100
- To: Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>, "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>
- CC: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
For some reason, the additional identifiers from the original XMP files were dropped in the RDF rather than having multiple identifiers, there is a comment instead <!--xmp:Identifier--> in the RDF. Best regards, Werner > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Florian Stegmaier [mailto:stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Jänner 2012 12:27 > An: tmichel@w3.org > Cc: Felix Sasaki; public-media-annotation@w3.org > Betreff: Re: XMP example and XMP JSON response files don't seem to be in > sync. > > Hi Thierry, > > yes, i have already told you that this is is a relict before our decision to use > the RDF data set as basis. Please use the attached version of the JSON > instead. In any case, the information of the RDF shall be reflected in the > JSON. > > Are there also difficulties because of *-a/*-b test cases? > > Cheers.
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 11:30:55 UTC