Re: XMP example and XMP JSON response files don't seem to be in sync.

Felix,

I have republished the  XMP .rdf and .ttl file
from
http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~sasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-xslt.ttl
and
http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~sasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-xslt.rdf

to
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg.ttl
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg.rdf

these RDf and TTL files seem identical to the former ones.


I hope it is also the case for the corresponding JSON response
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/JSON/normative_json_ma_xmp.json

Because I have used this file to make the testsuite ...

Thierry.



Le 02/02/2012 09:31, Felix Sasaki a écrit :
> Thierry, Florian, all,
>
> I have generated the .rdf and .ttl file from the .xml file automatically,
> these are definitely in sync. Florian, could you re-generate the JSON file
> from
>   <http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%**7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-**
> canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-**xslt.rdf<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~sasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-xslt.rdf>
>>
> ?
>
> Then we are sure that everything is OK.
>
> Felix
>
> 2012/1/31 Thierry Michel<tmichel@w3.org>
>
>> Felix,
>>
>> could you please check that the 4 files are indeed in sync
>>
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/**WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/**
>> metadata_formats/xmp-**canonical-original.xml<http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/xmp-canonical-original.xml><
>> http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%**7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/MAWG_**
>> test_canonical.xml<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/MAWG_test_canonical.xml>
>>>
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/**WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/**
>> metadata_formats/xmp-**canonical-mapped-to-mawg.rdf<http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg.rdf><
>> http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%**7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-**
>> canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-**xslt.rdf<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-xslt.rdf>
>>>
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/**WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/**
>> metadata_formats/xmp-**canonical-mapped-to-mawg.ttl<http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg.ttl><
>> http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%**7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-**
>> canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-**xslt.ttl<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-xslt.ttl>
>>>
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/**WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/**
>> API10/JSON/normative_json_ma_**xmp.json<http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/JSON/normative_json_ma_xmp.json>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> I would not want to have to redo the alll test suite ...
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>>
>>
>> Felix Sasaki a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/1/31 Thierry Michel<tmichel@w3.org<mailto:tmichel@w3.org>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Felix,
>>>
>>>     I have just published the RDF file you have sent.
>>>     http://www.w3.org/2008/**WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/**
>>> metadata_formats/xmp-**canonical-original.xml<http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/xmp-canonical-original.xml>
>>>
>>>     But I am getting lost now with your new wording.
>>>
>>>     Could you please send me the apropriate 4 files in sync ASAP
>>>
>>>     XMP- xml
>>>
>>>
>>> See http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~**sasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/MAWG_**
>>> test_canonical.xml<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~sasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/MAWG_test_canonical.xml><
>>> http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%**7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/MAWG_**
>>> test_canonical.xml<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/MAWG_test_canonical.xml>
>>>>
>>>
>>>     XMP- rdf
>>>
>>>
>>> See http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~**sasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-**
>>> canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-**xslt.rdf<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~sasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-xslt.rdf><
>>> http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%**7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-**
>>> canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-**xslt.rdf<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-xslt.rdf>
>>>>
>>>
>>>     XMP- ttl
>>>
>>>
>>> See http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~**sasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-**
>>> canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-**xslt.ttl<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~sasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-xslt.ttl><
>>> http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%**7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-**
>>> canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-**xslt.ttl<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-xslt.ttl>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     XMP- JSON
>>>
>>>
>>> As Florian pointed out, this file has not changed. It has been generated
>>> by Florian from the RDF, so I cannot re-generate it.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Felix
>>>
>>>
>>>     I am working on the implementation report and I must have the
>>>     final files to work on these.
>>>
>>>     thanks you.
>>>
>>>     thierry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Felix Sasaki a écrit :
>>>
>>>         Yes indeed :)
>>>
>>>         Felix
>>>
>>>         2012/1/31 Florian Stegmaier<stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.**de<stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
>>>         <mailto:stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-**passau.de<stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
>>>>
>>>         <mailto:stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-**passau.de<stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
>>>
>>>         <mailto:stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-**passau.de<stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>            Hi Felix, all!
>>>
>>>            In that case, Thierry should use the file as it was ;)
>>>
>>>            Cheers.
>>>            _____________________________
>>>            Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier
>>>            Chair of Distributed Information Systems
>>>            University of Passau
>>>            Innstr. 43
>>>            94032 Passau
>>>
>>>            Room 248 ITZ
>>>
>>>            Tel.: +49 851 509 3063<tel:%2B49%20851%20509%203063>
>>>         <tel:%2B49%20851%20509%203063>
>>>            Fax: +49 851 509 3062<tel:%2B49%20851%20509%203062>
>>>         <tel:%2B49%20851%20509%203062>
>>>
>>>            stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.**de<stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
>>>         <mailto:stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-**passau.de<stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
>>>>
>>>            <mailto:stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-**passau.de<stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
>>>
>>>         <mailto:stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-**passau.de<stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>            https://www.dimis.fim.uni-**passau.de/iris/<https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/>
>>>            http://twitter.com/fstegmai
>>>            _____________________________
>>>
>>>            Am 31.01.2012 um 13:02 schrieb Felix Sasaki:
>>>
>>>            >  This was an error in the XSLT that generates the RDF from the
>>>            original XMP. I have fixed this now, see
>>>            >
>>>            >  http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~**sasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~sasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/>
>>>         <http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%**7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/>
>>>>
>>>            <http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%**7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/>
>>>>
>>>            >
>>>                   http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~**sasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-
>>> **canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-**xslt.rdf<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/~sasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-xslt.rdf>
>>>         <http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%**7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-**
>>> canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-**xslt.rdf<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-xslt.rdf>
>>>>
>>>                   <http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%**
>>> 7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-**canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-**xslt.rdf<http://fabday.fh-potsdam.de/%7Esasaki/mawg/xmp/xslt/xmp-canonical-mapped-to-mawg-by-xslt.rdf>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>            >
>>>            >  Florian, I guess you when need to regenerate the JSON
>>>         from above
>>>            RDF.
>>>            >
>>>            >  Felix
>>>            >
>>>            >  2012/1/31 Bailer, Werner<werner.bailer@joanneum.at
>>>         <mailto:werner.bailer@**joanneum.at<werner.bailer@joanneum.at>>
>>>            <mailto:werner.bailer@**joanneum.at<werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
>>>
>>>         <mailto:werner.bailer@**joanneum.at<werner.bailer@joanneum.at>>>>
>>>
>>>            >  For some reason, the additional identifiers from the original
>>>            XMP files were dropped in the RDF rather than having multiple
>>>            identifiers, there is a comment instead
>>>         <!--xmp:Identifier-->  in
>>>            the RDF.
>>>            >
>>>            >  Best regards,
>>>            >  Werner
>>>            >
>>>            >  >  -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>            >  >  Von: Florian Stegmaier
>>>         [mailto:stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-**passau.de<stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
>>>         <mailto:stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-**passau.de<stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
>>>>
>>>            <mailto:stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-**passau.de<stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
>>>         <mailto:stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-**passau.de<stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
>>>>> ]
>>>            >  >  Gesendet: Dienstag, 31. Jänner 2012 12:27
>>>            >  >  An: tmichel@w3.org<mailto:tmichel@w3.org>
>>>         <mailto:tmichel@w3.org<mailto:tmichel@w3.org>>
>>>
>>>            >  >  Cc: Felix Sasaki; public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>>         <mailto:public-media-**annotation@w3.org<public-media-annotation@w3.org>
>>>>
>>>            <mailto:public-media-**annotation@w3.org<public-media-annotation@w3.org>
>>>
>>>         <mailto:public-media-**annotation@w3.org<public-media-annotation@w3.org>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>            >  >  Betreff: Re: XMP example and XMP JSON response files don't
>>>            seem to be in
>>>            >  >  sync.
>>>            >  >
>>>            >  >  Hi Thierry,
>>>            >  >
>>>            >  >  yes, i have already told you that this is is a relict
>>>         before
>>>            our decision to use
>>>            >  >  the RDF data set as basis. Please use the attached
>>>         version of
>>>            the JSON
>>>            >  >  instead. In any case, the information of the RDF shall be
>>>            reflected in the
>>>            >  >  JSON.
>>>            >  >
>>>            >  >  Are there also difficulties because of *-a/*-b test cases?
>>>            >  >
>>>            >  >  Cheers.
>>>            >
>>>            >
>>>            >
>>>            >  --
>>>            >  Felix Sasaki
>>>            >  DFKI / W3C Fellow
>>>            >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         --         Felix Sasaki
>>>         DFKI / W3C Fellow
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Felix Sasaki
>>> DFKI / W3C Fellow
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 2 February 2012 09:38:33 UTC