- From: Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:25:36 +0100
- To: Florian Stegmaier <florian.stegmaier@googlemail.com>
- CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>, "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>
Hi Florian, Thanks for observing this. My take is: 1) The RDF file should contain all four attributes: Actors, Actors_Display, Advisories and Director 2) The "locationName" contain US, not locator property. In the RDF file we have: <locator rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI">The_Titanic.mpg</loc ator> I will also have a look at the fragment mappings. /Joakim Note: It says in the header that I edited the file manually, that's incorrect, it was generated by an XSLT file. > >Le 18/11/2011 13:26, Florian Stegmaier a écrit : >> Dear all, >> >> I tried to create valid and normative JSON responses for the examples >>specified for the ontology test suite, but unfortunately it seems to me >>that there is somehow inconsistency present between examples and mapped >>file. >> >> I have started with CableLabs, but there are a few things, that are >>quiet unclear to me. My explanations rely on the CableLabs example file >>[1] and the corresponding RDF file [2]. >> >> There are certain properties, that have multiple entries or multiple >>properties to perform the mapping on. E.g., Actor has three persons - i >>have taken all into account as contributor. Beside actors, there are a >>few more properties listed to be expressed by contributors: >>Actors_Display, Advisories and Director. In the actual RDF file, only >>Actors and Directors are present. Advisories and Actors_display make no >>real sense in this example, but an automatic conversion would generate >>Contributors with the according values. How should we behave here? From >>my point of view, we have to define a behavior here (adding all, adding >>only exact if present, etc.). In the locator property of the RDF, "US" >>is the value, but actually not specified in the Example. >> >> Also i am not quite sure if the RDF document is complete. I wanted to >>see how a fragment is expressed, but cannot find any. From my point of >>view, i wanted to define the following as fragments: >> >> <App_Data App="MOD" Name="Chapter" Value="00:00:02:00,Opening Scene"/> >> <App_Data App="MOD" Name="Chapter" Value="00:15:12:00,They Meet"/> >> <App_Data App="MOD" Name="Chapter" Value="02:03:06:00,The Collision"/> >> <App_Data App="MOD" Name="Chapter" Value="02:55:15:00,She Goes Under"/> >> <App_Data App="MOD" Name="Chapter" Value="03:02:09:00,Final Scene"/> >> >> Someone who could help me with that? >> >> [1] >>http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/CL_AD >>I11_theworks.xml >> [2] >>http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/CL_AD >>I_1_1-to-w3cMediaOnt.rdf >> _____________________________ >> Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier >> Chair of Distributed Information Systems >> University of Passau >> Innstr. 43 >> 94032 Passau >> >> Room 248 ITZ >> >> Tel.: +49 851 509 3063 >> Fax: +49 851 509 3062 >> >> stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de >> https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/ >> http://twitter.com/fstegmai >> _____________________________ >> >>
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 16:26:08 UTC