- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:52:45 +0200
- To: Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>
- CC: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Le 19/05/2011 12:20, Joakim Söderberg a écrit : > Issue (1) is then resolved! Can somebody please take an action to update the table in section 7? I have done it. Thierry. > > /joakim > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pierre-Antoine Champin [mailto:pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr] > Sent: den 18 maj 2011 16:58 > To: Joakim Söderberg > Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org > Subject: Re: Decision needed before exit LC > > On 05/17/2011 01:46 PM, Joakim Söderberg wrote: >> Dear all, >> Next week we want to vote on moving the Ontology doc to CR. For this reason we need to decide upon the following: >> >> 1) Relaxing ma:relation, Protagonist: Martin Höffernig >> >> Decide whether to: >> i) Relax the constraint on ma:isRelatedTo, not restricted only to media resources. >> or >> ii) use rdfs:seeAlso to link associated documents > > as pointed out by Werner, ma:isRelatedTo is clearly not meant to be limited to point to media resources in the example of section 6, so that constraint was a bug introduced in the RDF ontology. > > (I'm excluding the option to rewrite section 6 now... :) > > I'm attaching the new XML/RDF and TTL ontologies. > > Note also that I therefore renamed ma:isRelatedTo to ma:hasRelatedResource, in order to be consistent in our naming scheme. > > This must be reflected in the correspondence table of section 7. > > This may also have an impact on the example RDF files produced by others. Apologies about that... > >> 2) Should we change all datatypes for literal and provide definitions for the formats: according to Jean Pierre ? >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011May/00 >> 32.html > > I already replied to Jean-Pierre about that (I disagreed). Is anyone esle pushing that proposal? > > However, the attached version follows Jean-Pierre's proposal to simplify some of the domain/range constraints (e.g. frame size) to make the ontology more flexible. > > pa > >> >> 3) Binary metadata formats, Protagonist: Silvia >> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011May/0 >> 075.html ) >> >> i) for OGG example, she can't provide *all* the properties mapping to the properties core set >> >> ii) The format been binary formats she can't create an RDF file. >> >> This conflicts with our exit criteria. Should we change those or is Sylvia missing something ? >> >> >> Regards >> /Joakim >
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2011 10:52:46 UTC