- From: Höffernig, Martin <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:45:09 +0200
- To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Dear all, >Note also that I therefore renamed ma:isRelatedTo to ma:hasRelatedResource, in order to be consistent in our naming scheme. In the latest MA ontology version (rev 34), ma:isRelatedTo is now defined as the inverse of ma:hasRelatedResource. ma:isRelatedTo is only defined as ObjectProperty without domain/range assertions even though the definition of ma:hasRelatedResource includes a domain assertion, namely ma:MediaResource. From my point of view, missing corresponding domain/range assertions between these two properties could lead to confusion about the correct usage. Therefore I suggest to add range ma:MediaResource to ma:isRelatedTo. Furthermore I would rename ma:isRelatedTo to ma:hasRelatedMediaResource, which would describe the semantics better. Best, Martin
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2011 10:45:41 UTC