- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 14:39:11 +0300
- To: tmichel@w3.org
- Cc: public-html@w3.org, 'Silvia Pfeiffer' <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 14:18 +0000, Thierry MICHEL wrote: > The MAWG would like to have a better understanding of your concerns. > Could you please explain more deeply what are your issues for access to > these metadata, and which requirements are not satisfactorily addressed > by the MAWG API. Could you provided a few use cases we could study and > see how our API fits. At this time, I have two general concerns and one specific concern. My general concerns are: 1) It's not clear to me that the APIs are motivated by strong use cases. What are the use cases that are considered to justify the implementation of these APIs? Can those use cases be addressed by other means? 2) I'm concerned that designing APIs (or specs in general) for a class of products (browsers in this case) without the participation of implementors of products from that class of products leads to designs that aren't suitable for the class of products. My specific concern is: 3) The API spec doesn't seem to cover how the API should behave when the API is called to request data that is in a file that hasn't been retrieved from the network yet. (That there is this sort of basic issue is related to my concern #2.) -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 6 May 2011 11:39:41 UTC