- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 14:18:38 +0300
- To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
- Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 08:32 -0700, Leonard Rosenthol wrote: > HTML is a markup language that can be (and is!) used in MANY DIFFERENT areas. To limit it (and it's design/development) to the "Web" is short-sighted and will only lead to interoperability problems in the future. It seems that my last paragraph hit a nerve. Let's ignore my third paragraph for a moment. Could you address the points in my first two paragraphs, please? > -----Original Message----- > From: Henri Sivonen [mailto:hsivonen@iki.fi] > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 12:37 AM > To: Leonard Rosenthol > Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer; tmichel@w3.org; public-html@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org > Subject: RE: follow up on the discussion in HTML5 about metadata access > > On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 16:52 -0700, Leonard Rosenthol wrote: > > > Right now, all use cases discussed on the HTML WG list were solvable > > > with server-side APIs. > > > > > That is NOT true, Silvia! > > > > I raised a number of use cases for non-browser-based UAs - for example > > EPUB viewers - where server-side was NOT an option. > > Why would an .epub book need to be able to introspect its own metadata > using a script? > > As for viewers, if the viewer wants to do stuff with metadata, it can > implement whatever interfaces it wants for its own private use. They > don't have to be standardized or exposed to scripts provided by the book > itself. > > (I tend to get skeptical when a Web API is motivated by non-Web uses. > The W3C has been down that road before. Has it ever been a good road?) > -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 6 May 2011 11:19:09 UTC