RE: Checked metadata examples and RDF files

All marked in green ;-) is one greener than the other?

-----Original Message-----
From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry MICHEL
Sent: vendredi, 17. juin 2011 11:55
To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Checked metadata examples and RDF files

Hi all,

I have check the multimedia metadata formats from the testsuite
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html


Status:

- Files marked in green are validated (RDF validated or XML well formed)
- Files marked in green are not valid (RDF valid or XML not well formed)
- Files marked in green can not be validated (binary files for example)


Missing Files
*************

We are still missing the following RDF files
MRSS
TXF
Flash

RDF Files invalid
*****************
EXIF_RDF
QT_RDF
3GP_RDF
MP4_RDF


XML Files invalid
*****************
Cablelabbs ADI 1.1 Example
IPTC_Example (empty file) please resend JP.
TXF_Example

TTL Files invalid
******************
EXIF_TTL
QT_TTL
3GP_TTL
MP4_TTL


Please send me your validated files.




Note that the above only checks the syntax of the documents but not the 
completeness of the properties.

We will have to manually check these file and probably assign reviewers.

Thierry.




-----------------------------------------
**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it 
are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. 
If you have received this email in error, 
please notify the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email 
message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************

Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 11:41:56 UTC