- From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:41:25 +0200
- To: "'tmichel@w3.org'" <tmichel@w3.org>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
All marked in green ;-) is one greener than the other? -----Original Message----- From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry MICHEL Sent: vendredi, 17. juin 2011 11:55 To: public-media-annotation@w3.org Subject: Checked metadata examples and RDF files Hi all, I have check the multimedia metadata formats from the testsuite http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html Status: - Files marked in green are validated (RDF validated or XML well formed) - Files marked in green are not valid (RDF valid or XML not well formed) - Files marked in green can not be validated (binary files for example) Missing Files ************* We are still missing the following RDF files MRSS TXF Flash RDF Files invalid ***************** EXIF_RDF QT_RDF 3GP_RDF MP4_RDF XML Files invalid ***************** Cablelabbs ADI 1.1 Example IPTC_Example (empty file) please resend JP. TXF_Example TTL Files invalid ****************** EXIF_TTL QT_TTL 3GP_TTL MP4_TTL Please send me your validated files. Note that the above only checks the syntax of the documents but not the completeness of the properties. We will have to manually check these file and probably assign reviewers. Thierry. ----------------------------------------- ************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway **************************************************
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 11:41:56 UTC