- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:14:42 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Silvia, Thankyou for your fast feedback. Files now published at. http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html Best, thierry. Le 17/06/2011 05:20, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : > Hi Thierry, > > attached validating rdf files on [1]. > > Cheers, > Silvia. > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org> wrote: >> Silvia, >> >> Sorry I indeed forgot to add the references in my earlier email, but I am >> sure you know about the W3C validator ;-) >> >> >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ >> >> [2] http://validator.w3.org/ >> >> >> Please run your files against these validator, it will inform what needs to >> be updated if necessary. >> >> I rather not make these changes myself, and prefer the editors to work on >> their files. >> >> Best, >> >> Thierry >> >> >> >> Le 16/06/2011 03:16, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : >>> >>> Thierry, >>> >>> You didn't provide your links for [1] and [2]. And you didn't list the >>> documents that are invalid. >>> >>> Can you please provide additional information so we know what has to be >>> changed? >>> >>> Alternatively, it's of course completely ok for you to make those >>> changes yourself in the spirit of keeping the various contributions in >>> sync. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Silvia. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Thank you for your imput for the Testsuite for the Ontology for Media >>>> Resources 1.0 >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html >>>> >>>> I have been looking at the metadata formats examples associated with the >>>> associated RDF/OWL file for correspondence with the core properties. >>>> >>>> Here are my remarks: >>>> >>>> 1- For some examples, the XML file does not validate against the XML >>>> validation (well formed document)[1]. >>>> --> XML documents MUST be well formed. >>>> >>>> 2- Most of the RDF files do not validate against the RDF validator [2] >>>> --> RDF documents MUST be valid >>>> >>>> 3- For some RDF file the URL of the corresponding example file are wrong: >>>> <rdf:Description rdf:about= .... >>>> or >>>> xml:base="... >>>> etc. >>>> >>>> --> Please make sure the corresponding URL are right. >>>> >>>> >>>> Please review your contribution and make sure the 3 above requirements >>>> are >>>> fulfilled. >>>> >>>> We will be looking at these files during the next MAWG F2F in >>>> ERCIM/Sophia. >>>> Therefore please provide valid documents before this event 28/29 june. >>>> >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Thierry. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 06:14:53 UTC