- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:20:32 +1000
- To: tmichel@w3.org
- Cc: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BANLkTi=az=n0j7y5azrr2495ufC+DsP7HA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Thierry, attached validating rdf files on [1]. Cheers, Silvia. On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> wrote: > Silvia, > > Sorry I indeed forgot to add the references in my earlier email, but I am > sure you know about the W3C validator ;-) > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ > > [2] http://validator.w3.org/ > > > Please run your files against these validator, it will inform what needs to > be updated if necessary. > > I rather not make these changes myself, and prefer the editors to work on > their files. > > Best, > > Thierry > > > > Le 16/06/2011 03:16, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : >> >> Thierry, >> >> You didn't provide your links for [1] and [2]. And you didn't list the >> documents that are invalid. >> >> Can you please provide additional information so we know what has to be >> changed? >> >> Alternatively, it's of course completely ok for you to make those >> changes yourself in the spirit of keeping the various contributions in >> sync. >> >> Cheers, >> Silvia. >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Thank you for your imput for the Testsuite for the Ontology for Media >>> Resources 1.0 >>> >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html >>> >>> I have been looking at the metadata formats examples associated with the >>> associated RDF/OWL file for correspondence with the core properties. >>> >>> Here are my remarks: >>> >>> 1- For some examples, the XML file does not validate against the XML >>> validation (well formed document)[1]. >>> --> XML documents MUST be well formed. >>> >>> 2- Most of the RDF files do not validate against the RDF validator [2] >>> --> RDF documents MUST be valid >>> >>> 3- For some RDF file the URL of the corresponding example file are wrong: >>> <rdf:Description rdf:about= .... >>> or >>> xml:base="... >>> etc. >>> >>> --> Please make sure the corresponding URL are right. >>> >>> >>> Please review your contribution and make sure the 3 above requirements >>> are >>> fulfilled. >>> >>> We will be looking at these files during the next MAWG F2F in >>> ERCIM/Sophia. >>> Therefore please provide valid documents before this event 28/29 june. >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Thierry. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
Attachments
- text/xml attachment: DougExample_ogv.rdf
- text/xml attachment: DougExample_webm.rdf
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 03:21:20 UTC