RE : [Reminder] editors of the Metadata examples to send their files

Hello Thierry,

what's the deadline? I have two rdf examples ready to EBUCore and NewsML2 but still have to produce one for TV-Anytime.

Regards,

Jean-Pierre

________________________________________
De : Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org]
Date d'envoi : dimanche, 5. juin 2011 18:30
À : Silvia Pfeiffer
Cc : Courtney Kennedy; Felix Sasaki; Evain, Jean-Pierre; tobias; Bailer, Werner; 이원석; public-media-annotation@w3.org
Objet : Re: [Reminder] editors of the Metadata examples to send their files

Sylvia,

Your files are added, so are links to OGG files in  1.2 Multimedia
container formats
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html


Thank you for your very much appreciated input

Best,

Thierry

Le 30/05/2011 12:09, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit :
> Hi Thierry, all,
>
> I'm providing the information for WebM.
>
> I've used mkvpropedit to encode metadata into the WebM file.
>
> The tags that you can pack into a Matroska file are described at
> http://www.matroska.org/technical/specs/tagging/index.html, but I'm
> not using all of them - just a small subpart.
>
> Please find attached the following files:
> * a WebM video file with encoded metadata
> * a RDF file that describes the metadata inside the WebM file
>
> These are for use in 1.2 Multimedia container formats  . Also note
> that the previously sent files for Ogg will be adequate in this
> section, too.
>
> Best Regards,
> Silvia.
>
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org>  wrote:
>> Sylvia,
>>
>>
>> Thank you for providing your OGG RDF file.
>>
>> It is now available from the Test ssuite
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html

>>
>> Please do send the same kind of WebM RDF file along with the WebM example.
>>
>> Best,
>> Thierry
>>
>> Le 24/05/2011 06:31, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit :
>>>
>>> I've taken the examples of others and created the attached RDF file.
>>> Things didn't seem fully consistent in other example files, so I did
>>> what I thought was right.
>>>
>>> If this is what you are after, I will create the same type of
>>> information for WebM.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Silvia.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
>>> <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>    wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Thierry,
>>>>
>>>> I am actually struggling with the requirement of writing an RDF. The
>>>> formats that we are looking at here are binary formats with fields in
>>>> a bitstream providing the information that we are after. Even if I
>>>> come up with an RDF, there will never be a file that you can can parse
>>>> or create with an RDF file. Do you really need to see a RDF file? Or
>>>> what is the intention of providing the RDF file?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The information that you can use in Ogg is available from the following
>>>> links:
>>>>
>>>> https://wiki.xiph.org/Ogg_Skeleton

>>>> ->    says that the following fields are compulsory
>>>> Content-type: mime type as per
>>>> http://wiki.xiph.org/MIME_Types_and_File_Extensions#Codec_MIME_types

>>>> Role: track role as per http://wiki.xiph.org/SkeletonHeaders#Role

>>>> Name: a unique free text string
>>>>
>>>> https://wiki.xiph.org/SkeletonHeaders

>>>> ->    list other useful message headers for skeleton
>>>>
>>>> http://xiph.org/vorbis/doc/v-comment.html

>>>> https://wiki.xiph.org/Vorbiscomment

>>>> ->    list the meta data available in vorbiscomment headers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now for the attached Ogg file. It has been created with ffmpeg2theora
>>>> and the following metadata:
>>>>
>>>> skeleton of video track:
>>>> Content-Type: video/theora
>>>> Role: video/main
>>>> Name: video_1
>>>>
>>>> skeleton of audio track:
>>>> Content-Type: audio/vorbis
>>>> Role: audio/main
>>>> Name: audio_1
>>>>
>>>> vorbiscomment of both, video and audio track:
>>>> TITLE=W3C and Twitte
>>>> DATE=2009-10-08
>>>> LOCATION=Sydney
>>>> ORGANIZATION=Web Directions South
>>>> COPYRIGHT=CC-BY-SA
>>>> CONTACT=silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> If this kind of information is sufficient, I will try to get you the
>>>> same for WebM.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Silvia.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org>    wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Silvia,
>>>>>
>>>>> You may want to check the files already provided.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Format_mapping_review

>>>>>
>>>>> Thierry.
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 04/05/2011 12:09, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are there example files to do these?
>>>>>> Silvia.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/05/2011, at 7:05 PM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org>      wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is a reminder for the editors of the Metadata examples to send
>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>> files (XML and RDF).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are now close to move the Media Ontology document to Candidate Rec
>>>>>>> (CR)
>>>>>>> In order to exit CR, we must deliver a set of testcases for each
>>>>>>> format.
>>>>>>> So far we have a fair amount of files.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But we are still missing the following:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> QuickTime     Courtney
>>>>>>> 3GP             Courtney
>>>>>>> MP4             Courtney
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> XMP             Felix
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> EBUCore     Jean-Pierre
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> MediaRDF Vocabulary Tobias
>>>>>>> LOM v1484-12-1        Tobias
>>>>>>> METS v1.7        Tobias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OGG             Sylvia
>>>>>>> WEBM             Silvia
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dublin Core    Thierry
>>>>>>> Flash            Thierry
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SMPTE RP210-11     Werner
>>>>>>> TTML             Werner
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Media RSS v1.1.2 Wonsuk
>>>>>>> TXFeed v0.9     Wonsuk
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Deadline for sending these file was set to end of May 2011.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Per W3C process, all format missing these files will have to be
>>>>>>> removed
>>>>>>> from the Media Ontology specification in order to allow moving forward
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> PR.
>>>>>>> Therefore please send your files ASAP.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thierry
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
-----------------------------------------
**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it 
are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. 
If you have received this email in error, 
please notify the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email 
message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************

Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 02:31:25 UTC