- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:30:55 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: Courtney Kennedy <ckennedy@apple.com>, Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>, "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>, tobias <tobias@tobiasbuerger.com>, "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>, 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Sylvia, Your files are added, so are links to OGG files in 1.2 Multimedia container formats http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html Thank you for your very much appreciated input Best, Thierry Le 30/05/2011 12:09, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : > Hi Thierry, all, > > I'm providing the information for WebM. > > I've used mkvpropedit to encode metadata into the WebM file. > > The tags that you can pack into a Matroska file are described at > http://www.matroska.org/technical/specs/tagging/index.html, but I'm > not using all of them - just a small subpart. > > Please find attached the following files: > * a WebM video file with encoded metadata > * a RDF file that describes the metadata inside the WebM file > > These are for use in 1.2 Multimedia container formats . Also note > that the previously sent files for Ogg will be adequate in this > section, too. > > Best Regards, > Silvia. > > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org> wrote: >> Sylvia, >> >> >> Thank you for providing your OGG RDF file. >> >> It is now available from the Test ssuite >> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html >> >> Please do send the same kind of WebM RDF file along with the WebM example. >> >> Best, >> Thierry >> >> Le 24/05/2011 06:31, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : >>> >>> I've taken the examples of others and created the attached RDF file. >>> Things didn't seem fully consistent in other example files, so I did >>> what I thought was right. >>> >>> If this is what you are after, I will create the same type of >>> information for WebM. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Silvia. >>> >>> >>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer >>> <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Thierry, >>>> >>>> I am actually struggling with the requirement of writing an RDF. The >>>> formats that we are looking at here are binary formats with fields in >>>> a bitstream providing the information that we are after. Even if I >>>> come up with an RDF, there will never be a file that you can can parse >>>> or create with an RDF file. Do you really need to see a RDF file? Or >>>> what is the intention of providing the RDF file? >>>> >>>> >>>> The information that you can use in Ogg is available from the following >>>> links: >>>> >>>> https://wiki.xiph.org/Ogg_Skeleton >>>> -> says that the following fields are compulsory >>>> Content-type: mime type as per >>>> http://wiki.xiph.org/MIME_Types_and_File_Extensions#Codec_MIME_types >>>> Role: track role as per http://wiki.xiph.org/SkeletonHeaders#Role >>>> Name: a unique free text string >>>> >>>> https://wiki.xiph.org/SkeletonHeaders >>>> -> list other useful message headers for skeleton >>>> >>>> http://xiph.org/vorbis/doc/v-comment.html >>>> https://wiki.xiph.org/Vorbiscomment >>>> -> list the meta data available in vorbiscomment headers >>>> >>>> >>>> Now for the attached Ogg file. It has been created with ffmpeg2theora >>>> and the following metadata: >>>> >>>> skeleton of video track: >>>> Content-Type: video/theora >>>> Role: video/main >>>> Name: video_1 >>>> >>>> skeleton of audio track: >>>> Content-Type: audio/vorbis >>>> Role: audio/main >>>> Name: audio_1 >>>> >>>> vorbiscomment of both, video and audio track: >>>> TITLE=W3C and Twitte >>>> DATE=2009-10-08 >>>> LOCATION=Sydney >>>> ORGANIZATION=Web Directions South >>>> COPYRIGHT=CC-BY-SA >>>> CONTACT=silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com >>>> >>>> If this kind of information is sufficient, I will try to get you the >>>> same for WebM. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Silvia. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Silvia, >>>>> >>>>> You may want to check the files already provided. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Format_mapping_review >>>>> >>>>> Thierry. >>>>> >>>>> Le 04/05/2011 12:09, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> Are there example files to do these? >>>>>> Silvia. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> >>>>>> On 04/05/2011, at 7:05 PM, Thierry MICHEL<tmichel@w3.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is a reminder for the editors of the Metadata examples to send >>>>>>> their >>>>>>> files (XML and RDF). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are now close to move the Media Ontology document to Candidate Rec >>>>>>> (CR) >>>>>>> In order to exit CR, we must deliver a set of testcases for each >>>>>>> format. >>>>>>> So far we have a fair amount of files. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But we are still missing the following: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> QuickTime Courtney >>>>>>> 3GP Courtney >>>>>>> MP4 Courtney >>>>>>> >>>>>>> XMP Felix >>>>>>> >>>>>>> EBUCore Jean-Pierre >>>>>>> >>>>>>> MediaRDF Vocabulary Tobias >>>>>>> LOM v1484-12-1 Tobias >>>>>>> METS v1.7 Tobias >>>>>>> >>>>>>> OGG Sylvia >>>>>>> WEBM Silvia >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dublin Core Thierry >>>>>>> Flash Thierry >>>>>>> >>>>>>> SMPTE RP210-11 Werner >>>>>>> TTML Werner >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Media RSS v1.1.2 Wonsuk >>>>>>> TXFeed v0.9 Wonsuk >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Deadline for sending these file was set to end of May 2011. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Per W3C process, all format missing these files will have to be >>>>>>> removed >>>>>>> from the Media Ontology specification in order to allow moving forward >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> PR. >>>>>>> Therefore please send your files ASAP. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thierry >>>>> >>>> >>
Received on Sunday, 5 June 2011 16:31:27 UTC