- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:44:58 +0200
- To: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>
- CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
OK now says "RDF tested" see http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#metadata-mapping-table Le 20/07/2011 16:53, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit : > Then to be clear you should say "RDF test" here > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] > Sent: mercredi, 20. juillet 2011 16:24 > To: Evain, Jean-Pierre > Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org > Subject: RE : multimedia metadata formats examples satus and update > > > > Le 20/07/2011 16:01, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit : >> Then in this case for identifier I would say "no, not applicable". > > > We had agree that "N/A" is used when there is no mapping for the format. > "yes" when the property is used in an example > "not" when the property is not used in an example, but there is a mapping. > In your case there is a mapping but it is not used "tested". Therefore I > would say "no". >> >> I want ambiguity to be lift off as EBUCore of course could have tested identifier. It is already ambiguous enough to say 'tested' -> against what: RDF only? > > If you have a better suggestion than "tested" I am open to any other > suggestion here. > What we must do, is fulfill our CR exit criteria which says: > > "For formats providing an example using only a subset of the properties > of the core vocabulary, the missing properties will be highlighted in > the corresponding mapping tables". > > Suggestions ? > > Thierry > > >> >> Best regards, >> >> Jean-Pierre >> ________________________________________ >> De : Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org] >> Date d'envoi : mercredi, 20. juillet 2011 15:57 >> À : Evain, Jean-Pierre >> Cc : public-media-annotation@w3.org >> Objet : Re: RE : RE : RE : multimedia metadata formats examples satus and update >> >> Le 20/07/2011 15:34, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit : >>> <<<Prise de tete>>> >> >> ??? >> >> >> For clarification >> in the mapping table >> >> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#ebu-table >> >> >> I now read for "identifier" >> N.A (removed from RDF) >> >> shouln't it be "no" ? >> as there is an exact mapping, but not used (tested) in the RDF. >> >> >>> >>> Voilà >>> >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> De : Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org] >>> Date d'envoi : mercredi, 20. juillet 2011 15:15 >>> À : Evain, Jean-Pierre >>> Cc : public-media-annotation@w3.org >>> Objet : Re: RE : RE : multimedia metadata formats examples satus and update >>> >>> Le 19/07/2011 20:37, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit : >>>> The updated webpage. >>>> >>>> I believe I am done. >>> >>> Sorry but in the HTML file you have sent, the "Tested" column is empty. >>> >>> Thierry >>> >>> ----------------------------------------- >>> ************************************************** >>> This email and any files transmitted with it >>> are confidential and intended solely for the >>> use of the individual or entity to whom they >>> are addressed. >>> If you have received this email in error, >>> please notify the system manager. >>> This footnote also confirms that this email >>> message has been swept by the mailgateway >>> ************************************************** >
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2011 14:45:19 UTC