- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:34:39 +0200
- To: Davy Van Deursen <davy.vandeursen@ugent.be>
- CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Davy, For the implementation of the "Ontology for Media Resources 1.0", specification we do not require tools to implement it. In fact it will be the corresponding API spec [2] who will have to show implementation experience (a browser or/and a webservice for example). For the "Ontology for Media Resources 1.0", we have agreed that an aololication using the Media Annotation Ontology (like a website) [3] along with our tesuite showing examples of mappings for ech formats to the MA Ontology would suffice. Refer to the exit criteria for further info [4]. -------------- - Each format listed in the testsuite for Ontology for Media Resources 1.0 has at least one example file covering a subset or all of the properties of the core vocabulary of the Media Ontology available for each format (e.g some formats may not have a mapping to all the properties core set; for example the "MP4" format does not have a property mapping to the "identifier" property of the core vocabulary of the Media Ontology). For formats providing an exemple using only a subset of the properties of the core vocabulary, the missing properties will be highlighted in the corresponding mapping tables - Each format listed in the testsuite has an associated RDF/OWL file for correspondence between the core properties and the RDF vocabulary. - The testsuite may also provide an associated Turtle (Terse RDF Triple Language) [Turtle] file for convenience. - At least two applications have been demonstrated that use features of the Media Annotation Ontology. -------------- Finally to answer you question about your NinSuna platform publishing technical metadata in RDF, If it does uses the Media Annotations OWL ontology (like it seems to be the case, it will be indeed an application demonstrating the use of features of the Media Annotation Ontology. and we will be happy to add it to our application list at [3]. If you need further details, let us know. Best, Thierry. [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediaont-1.0.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-api-1.0 [3] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/#Implementa [4] http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediaont-1.0.html#status Le 08/07/2011 15:07, Davy Van Deursen a écrit : > Hi all, > > what do you consider as an 'implementation' for the Ontology for Media > Resources? > > For instance, is a system that publishes metadata according to the Media > Annotations OWL ontology considered as an implementation? For example, > our NinSuna platform publishes technical metadata (in RDF) about each > media resource that is available in the platform (see for example [1]). > > Best regards, > > Davy > > [1] http://ninsuna.elis.ugent.be/Media/Showcase/Obama > > On 7/07/2011 18:11, Thierry MICHEL wrote: >> >> >> The Ontology for Media Resources 1.0 is a W3C >> Candidate Recommendation ! >> >> Congratulatiuons for all of you who have given a lot of work ti achive >> this. >> >> Our next goal is now to exit CR and enter PR. To do so we will have to >> fulfill our exit criteria. >> This means finalizing our testsuite, and provide correct examples. >> >> I will send a mail latter on to let you know how to revise your examples. >> >> Best, >> >> Thierry >> >> >> >> >> -------- Message original -------- >> Sujet: Ontology for Media Resources 1.0 is a W3C Candidate >> Recommendation (Call for Implementations) >> Date de renvoi : Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:02:05 +0000 >> De (renvoi) : w3c-ac-members@w3.org >> Date : Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:01:56 +0200 >> De : Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org> >> Organisation : W3C >> Pour : w3c-ac-forum@w3.org <w3c-ac-forum@w3.org> >> >> >> Dear Advisory Committee Representative, >> >> I am pleased to announce that Ontology for Media Resources 1.0 is a W3C >> Candidate Recommendation: >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-mediaont-10-20110707 >> >> The approval and publication are in response to this transition request: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2011AprJun/0065.html >> >> The disposition of Last Call comments is available at: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/doc/ >> >> >> >> There were no Formal Objections. >> >> Patent disclosures relevant to this specification may be found on the >> Media Annotations Working Group Working Group's patent disclosure page in >> conformance with W3C policy: >> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/42786/status >> >> The Media Annotations Working Group expects to receive more comments in >> the form of implementation feedback and test cases. The Working Group >> believes it will have satisfied its implementation criteria by 01 August >> 2011 and will not transit to Proposed Recommendation at least before the >> API for Media Resource 1.0 specification enters Candidate Recommendation. >> >> This Call for Implementations follows section 7.4.3 of the W3C Process >> Document: http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#cfi >> >> Thank you, >> >> For Tim Berners-Lee, Director, and >> Philippe Le Hégaret, Video in the Web Activity Lead, >> Ian Jacobs, Head of W3C Communications; >> Coralie Mercier >> > >
Received on Friday, 8 July 2011 14:35:08 UTC