- From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:19:03 +0100
- To: public-media-annotation <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTi=6L1baZabdQd9w7ut12WxFVoO0eQ8kUFKv4gcL@mail.gmail.com>
2011/2/7 Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch> > Apologies for tomorrow. I am at the W3C Web&TV seminar in Berlin. > Same here. Felix > > I am waiting for final comments on the RDF and may send a new version later > today with minor changes. > > I feel I have restate my opinion about the values of the ma:compression > attribute. > > The current situation is that the value can be "URI or string". > > There is a proposal to make it URI only. > > I am personally in favour or leaving some flexibility at this stage. I can > personally do URI only but I am not sure it is true for all the community. > > If there were a decision taken to change compression to URI only, I would > therefore require that the same logic to have only dereferencable values > applies to all pairs URI/string, which should be changed to URI only. > > Best regards, > > Jean-pierre > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto: > public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry MICHEL > Sent: lundi, 7. février 2011 09:59 > To: Joakim Söderberg; public-media-annotation@w3.org > Subject: [AGENDA] Media Annotations WG Teleconf - 2011-02-08 > > > Dear all, > Here is the agenda for tomorrow telecon. > Joakim and Daniel are not available, therefore Joakim asked me to chair > tomorrow. Joakim may join the conf > > Best Regards, > Thierry > > ------------------------------- > > 1. Convene > Media Annotations WG > Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 6294 ("MAWG") Alternative dial > numbers: > France (Nice): +33.4.26.46.79.03 > UK (Bristol) : +44.117.370.6152 > IRC channel: #mediaann > Tuesday 2011-02-08 12:00-13:00 UTC, (ie, Amsterdam, Paris, Stockholm 13:00) > Regrets: Daniel. > Chair: Thierry > Scribe: volunteer? > > Minutes to appear: http://www.w3.org/2011/02/08-mediaann-minutes.html > Propose to accept F2F minutes: (last week telecon was cancelled) > http://www.w3.org/2011/01/25-mediaann-minutes.html > > 2. Next meeting > 2011/02/15 at the F2F. > > 3. Next 10th MAWG F2F meeting in Cupertino, CA (US) hosted by Apple, > 15-16 February 2011. > > Please answer the registration page and say if you will attend or not. > <http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42786/MAWG-Cupertino/> > > > Workshop at Ericsson in San Jose, after next F2F in the Valley (17/2). > Please reply Joakim email > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Jan/0114.html > > 4. Items > [A] Action items: > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open > > > [B] Follow up on Implementation of LC comments, > > ** Ontology : We are done with LC comments ! > > > http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/ > > only one small issue from Jean Pierre for > for ma:compression, use of ea dereferencable URIs > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Jan/0118.html > > ** API: We are done with LC comments ! > > > > http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-api-1.0-20100608/ > > > 1- Media Ontology spec, can we move it to 2nd LC? > > Asked everybody to review carefully the Media Ontology spec, > > Two responses: > - from Werner: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Feb/0014.html > > - from Mari Carmen: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Feb/0015.html > > > 2- Media API spec and API discussion > > Following last week discussion on API, Florian has sent a proposal > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Jan/0113.html > > AOB ? > > ----------------------------------------- > ************************************************** > This email and any files transmitted with it > are confidential and intended solely for the > use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. > If you have received this email in error, > please notify the system manager. > This footnote also confirms that this email > message has been swept by the mailgateway > ************************************************** > > >
Received on Monday, 7 February 2011 09:27:41 UTC