- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:42:59 +0200
- To: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@dfki.de>
- CC: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Le 31/08/2011 16:20, Felix Sasaki a écrit : > Hi all, > > attached is an update of the XMP test suite file and the corresponding > mapping table. Thierry, can you upload these? Files Uploaded. tessuite updated accordingly. http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html Ontology spec accordingly. http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#xmp-table > > I have followed the guidelines at > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/Guidelines_for_ontology_examples > and the DC example linked from the guidelines. I implemented the comments > about XMP at > http://www.w3.org/2011/06/28-mediaann-minutes.html > > Three mappings have no example in the RDF file: ma:relation to DerivedFrom, > History and Ingredients from the xmpMM namespace. OK. > > About the comments from Antoine archived at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Aug/0002.html > > >>> For ex I read in the latter: xmpDM:copyright is Deprecated in favour of >>> dc:rights. >>> I don't find it in http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10/#xmp- >>> table, but it's before in the doc. >>> More important, xmpRights:UsageTerms seems to have disappeared from >>> And xmpRights:webStatement is now xmpDM:webStatement in some part of >>> the XMP doc, but xmpRights:webStatement in others. In fact it is very >>> unclear to me what the correct thing is (except that xmpRights: is not >>> formally defined in the doc, as a self-standing namespace). > > I would leave this to the group to decide whether they want to make another > loop with Adobe about this. After all Adobe has to say what is adequate > here. Could you ask your contact at Adobe to check this issue ? > > Felix >
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2011 14:42:31 UTC