- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 17:51:31 +0200
- To: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message resent to MAWG List for archives ;-) -------- Message original -------- Sujet: Re: AW: XMP and OMR doc Date : Tue, 02 Aug 2011 17:39:29 +0200 De : Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> Pour : Bailer, Werner <werner.bailer@joanneum.at> Copie à : Véronique Malaisé <vmalaise@gmail.com>, Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@dfki.de>, Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> OK, Werner! For info I've just spotted that xmpRights:UsageTerms and xmpRights:webStatement are in the XMP Spec. But in part 1, not in part 2. Puzzling... Antoine > Dear Antoine, > > thanks for spotting this. > > As far as I know, Felix will be working on a revision of the XMP examples later this months, so I think these issues can be considered then. > > Best regards, > Werner > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Antoine Isaac [mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl] >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 02. August 2011 16:26 >> An: Véronique Malaisé; Felix Sasaki; Bailer, Werner >> Betreff: XMP and OMR doc >> >> Dear Véronique, Felix, Werner, >> >> The story is too long to tell, but I happen to be right now looking at >> the Ontology for Media Resources 1.0 and the latest XMP doc >> (http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/xmp/pdfs/XMPSpecifica >> tionPart2.pdf). And there might be some discrepancies. >> >> For ex I read in the latter: xmpDM:copyright is Deprecated in favour of >> dc:rights. I don't find it in http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10/#xmp- >> table, but it's before in the doc. >> More important, xmpRights:UsageTerms seems to have disappeared from >> And xmpRights:webStatement is now xmpDM:webStatement in some part of >> the XMP doc, but xmpRights:webStatement in others. In fact it is very >> unclear to me what the correct thing is (except that xmpRights: is not >> formally defined in the doc, as a self-standing namespace). >> >> Maybe that's the kind of thing you'd want to fix, if you have not >> spotted it already. As I unfortunately don't have time and will to mess >> with a formal comment procedure, I let you judge. Of course I've >> nothing against forwarding this mail to anyone, if it's relevant! >> >> Cheers, >> >> Antoine >
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 15:51:48 UTC