Re: [mawg] action-249: rdfs taskforce update

Hi all,

On 31/05/2010 11:16, Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote:
> Hello Tobias,
> 
> It looks like very similar to what I would have done.

same here.

A small question though:

why are Publisher and Creator not subclasses of Actor, while Contributor
is ?

I would have expected Creator, Actor and Contributor to be subclasses of
Actor, as well as Person and Organization -- although of course the
Creator/Actor/Contributor distinction is orthogonal to the
Person/Organization partition...

> Of course, there are some issues like naming convention of properties
> like the "is-a" style or not.

by this, do you mean "is-a" vs. "isA" ?

> The other issue, going one step further is about e.g. title or
> description types.  My proposal for this is as follows: e.g. title
> types like 'main' should be sub-properties of the title property. In
> practice, migrating to RDF would require taking all controlled terms
> from the predefined list of types and change them into subproperties.
> If you update the list, then you create a new sub-property -> this is
> taking benefit of the scalability of the RDF model.

I agree with that.

  pa


> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jean-pierre
> 
> -----Original Message----- From:
> public-media-annotation-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tobias
> Bürger Sent: lundi, 31. mai 2010 11:01 To:
> public-media-annotation@w3.org Subject: [mawg] action-249: rdfs
> taskforce update
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> with respect to my action-249: I hacked the first version of our
> ma-ont proposal. You can find a visualization of it at 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Ontology_Implementation
>
>  I will add a documentation and the sources to the mawg wiki latest 
> tomorrow on the same page.
> 
> Any feedback and contributions more than welcome!
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Tobias
>

Received on Monday, 31 May 2010 14:07:55 UTC