Re: mediaont-10 RDFs availabilty?

2010/3/15 Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>

>
>
> Felix Sasaki wrote:
>
>
>> It is OK with the W3C process to have a taskforce inside the working group
>> if the working group agrees to do that.
>>
>
>
> Yes I agree to the above statement we can have subset of participants
> working on a task and propose it to the WG.
>

Great, to to have your confirmation.


>
> The rule we have to follow is that the deliverables are in scope with our
> charter.
> http://www.w3.org/2008/01/media-annotations-wg.html
>
> Which seems to be the case for denifing the RDF
> representation of the ontology.
>
> I read in the Charter;
>
> "The intent is to help publishers to harmonize metadata information encoded
> in different languages but also to help developers with the lack of
> syntactic and semantic interoperability. Ultimately, users of the ontology
> should also be able to take advantage of Semantic Web technologies, such as
> the SPARQL Query Language for RDF.
> ...
> The Group should also consider making the underlying media metadata
> available to a browser ECMAScript API in some simple RDF form, especially as
> a number of the underlying data formats permit full RDF. "
>
>
>
> @ Daniel: How about asking people on
>
>> the call tomorrow if they agree with the taskforce? If yes, we can have
>> the
>> taskforce call tomorrow. Thierry, what do you think?
>>
>
> Tomorrow is short notice to reserve a bridge with the Admin team. But if
> needed,I could set up a conference on the fly.
>
>
> Also remenber that between March 14 and March 28, the time difference
> between US and Europe will be 1 hour less than it currently is.
>

Good point. So let's see if we can use the 2 hours directly after the
regular call.

Felix

>
>