- From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:52:03 +0200
- To: tmichel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: public-media-annotation <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTinIgi7UuQM80vQhctjrUNnG_ZSvpel6bWxR62-m@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Thierry, 2010/7/1 Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org> > > > > Hello, > > > I read in the minutes the following resolution: > > RESOLUTION: extend the LC period until the end of August. > > I am unsure if this mean that the LC period is extended for the external > groups to provide comments (which we should to announce) or if the MAWG will > start responding to the comments end of August. > > If it is the first case, It is the first case. > extending the LC period for external groups, I think it would not be a good > choice. My experience is that Groups provide LC comments at the end of the > period and in lots of cases, after that period. If we extend until end of > August, we will delay reception of comments maybe until end of september. > I have similar experiences with extending the review period. However, I have also the experiences that during the summer (break) many potential reviewers don't write reviews. That includes also the media fragments group. That was the background for our resolution. Felix > > I would prefer to kept the current deadline and ping external Groups to > send their comments (as we have currently received very few of them). > > Thierry. > > > > > > > > Felix Sasaki wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> the chairs were not on the call. We had a meeting without them, see the >> minutes at >> http://www.w3.org/2010/06/29-mediaann-minutes.html >> The minutes include some resolutions, which we would like to fix via mail. >> If you disagree with the one of the statements marked as "RESOLUTION", >> please speak up ASAP via mail. Also, Daniel, Joakim, Thierry, we created >> some action items for you. >> >> Felix >> >>
Received on Thursday, 1 July 2010 07:52:33 UTC