Re: Updated ontology doc within Seoul F2F meeting

Hi everyone,

Well, one problem with this restricted definition is, for example that  
all the "spaghetti westerns" (a fistfull of dollars etc directed by  
Sergio Leone) would have the location "Italy" although the story is  
supposed to take place in Texas/Mexico. I would be in favor of keeping  
the extended definition: a resource can be about some place and be  
shot in another one. It is actually quite common for movies!

Best,
Véronique

On Feb 26, 2010, at 7:35 AM, 이원석 wrote:

> Hi. Werner and all,
> Thanks for your additional comment.
>
> I agree with your comment. I will use this instead of earlier one J
>
> Best regards,
> Wonsuk.
>
> From: Bailer, Werner [mailto:werner.bailer@joanneum.at]
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:12 AM
> To: 이원석; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Updated ontology doc within Seoul F2F meeting
>
> One more comment: The definition of ma:location is “A location  
> associated with the resource. This property can refer to a depicted  
> location or the location where the resource was captured.” We had  
> changed that to “A location where the resource has been shot/ 
> recorded.” at the 4th F2F (see summary table). I prefer the letter,  
> as it is a stricter definition.
>
> Best regards,
> Werner
>
> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org 
> ] On Behalf Of ???
> Sent: Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2010 09:36
> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Updated ontology doc within Seoul F2F meeting
>
> below is the updated ontology doc within Seoul F2F meeting.
> Please review and if you have any comment, let me know.
>
> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html
>
> best regards,
> Wonsuk.
>

Received on Friday, 26 February 2010 09:20:00 UTC