- From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
- Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:32:01 +0100
- To: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Dear Thierry, if a representative of a company managing a format doesn't provide information on this format, for any reason, it would seem difficult to let a third party take the initiative of doing it, This would need at least checking if the information is public or not (as you say, in particular if we are speaking of a proprietary format). I would also take it out. Best regards, Jean-Pierre ________________________________________ De : public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] de la part de Thierry MICHEL [tmichel@w3.org] Date d'envoi : mercredi, 29. décembre 2010 11:22 À : public-media-annotation@w3.org Objet : Flash container format mapping table in the Ontology spec, Hi, In the multimedia container formats mapping tables of the Ontology spec, the FLV section currently says: http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html#d0e12720 -------------- 5.2.3.2 flv Beginning in Flash version 10, FLV file can embed XMP data. Refer to the above XMP metadata format mapping table for more details. -------------- I have contacted many times Adobe (Larry Masinter)to get some feedback on this container format table, but did not get any suggestion to fill a table (like for the other mapping tables, like mov, mp4, ect. Do we want to leave this Flash section as is for CR , or remove it ? Or does anyone has knowledge on this particular format to fill the table ? Flash being a proprietary format I would simply remove it. Thierry ----------------------------------------- ************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway **************************************************
Received on Wednesday, 29 December 2010 11:37:02 UTC