Dear Joakim, i agree, that such a paragraph makes sense. I have seen, that the f2f agenda also has a time slot for media ontology document. We should also keep in mind that there is a wiki entry regarding ontology doc improvements. IMO we should use this entry to summarize these topics. Best, Florian ___________________________ Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier Chair of Distributed Information Systems University of Passau Innstr. 43 94032 Passau Room 248 ITZ Tel.: +49 851 509 3063 Fax: +49 851 509 3062 stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de ___________________________ Quote of the week: Computer. This is a Class-A compulsory directive. Compute, to the last digit, the value of pi. (Spock) Am 21.10.2009 um 12:55 schrieb Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.co m>: > Best Ontology Doc editors, > , > I have assembled our answers to "Why not use DC?" under: > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Improvements_/_Enhancement_for_a_revision_of_the_%22Ontology_for_Media_Resource_1.0%22_document > > My idea is that we could perhaps formualte a paragraph that explains > why DC elements occur, and put it in version 2.0 of the Ontology > Document. > In that way we will avoid having this question reoccur in the future! > > What do you say? > > /Joakim
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2009 13:31:59 UTC