- From: Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:46:46 +0100
- To: Soohong Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>
- Cc: Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@sti2.at>, Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
+1 I also agree to postpone the subproperties discussion until we finished the basic mission. Best, Florian ___________________________ Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier Chair of Distributed Information Systems University of Passau Innstr. 43 94032 Passau Room 248 ITZ Tel.: +49 851 509 3063 Fax: +49 851 509 3062 stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de ___________________________ Quote of the week: Computer. This is a Class-A compulsory directive. Compute, to the last digit, the value of pi. (Spock) Am 24.11.2009 um 07:01 schrieb Soohong Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com >: > Thanks Tobias for the clarification, That's my sense...! > > > Daniel > > ------ > Soohong Daniel Park > Samsung Electronics, DMC R&D > http://sites.google.com/site/natpt00 > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media- >> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tobias Burger >> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 9:33 PM >> To: 'Daniel Park' >> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org >> Subject: Re: Definition of subproperties and way forward >> >> +1 from my side as well. >> >> But as PA suggested, we should consider the necessary >> "placeholders" in >> case we introduce subproperties in the future. >> >> Best >> >> Tobias >> >> Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote: >>> >>> +1, JP >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* public-media-annotation-request@w3.org >>> [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] *On Behalf Of >>> *Daniel >> Park >>> *Sent:* lundi, 23. novembre 2009 12:39 >>> *To:* public-media-annotation@w3.org >>> *Subject:* Definition of subproperties and way forward >>> >>> >>> >>> Folks, >>> >>> >>> >>> We spent too much time for that issue both in Santa Clara and in >>> mailing list. It's time to come up with a direction at this stage I >>> believe. I (chair hat-on) don't have an objection with the summary >>> below from Felix, also, that seems to us very reasonable way for the >>> first step... >>> >>> >>> >>> Call for your opinion, any strong objection ? >>> >>> >>> >>> It will be also discussed finally at upcoming teleconf tomorrow. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Daniel >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Soohong Daniel Park >>> Samsung Electronics, DMC R&D >>> http://sites.google.com/site/natpt00 >>> >>> [cut-and-paste] >>> >>> There seems to be one open question to me: Is it OK for us to start >>> work on subproperties although we have not reached our goals even >>> with >>> the simple properties? IMO, we should first for all simple >>> properties >>> - define the API methods (done to some extend) >>> - provide test cases and test suite material (not done at all) >>> - run the tests with at least two implementations >>> so that we can be sure to declare victory, even if we don't get to >>> the >>> sub property part. >>> So I am saying not "no" about sub properties, but postpone work on >>> them until we have done our basic job. >>> >>> Would you and others agree with that? >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Felix >>> >> >> -- >> _________________________________________________ >> Dr. Tobias Bürger >> >> STI Innsbruck >> University of Innsbruck, Austria >> http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/ >> >> tobias.buerger@sti2.at >> __________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 24 November 2009 06:47:42 UTC