2009/11/23 Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@sti2.at> > +1 from my side as well. > > But as PA suggested, we should consider the necessary "placeholders" in > case we introduce subproperties in the future. > Fine by me. Best, Felix > > Best > > Tobias > > > Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote: > >> >> +1, JP >> >> >> *From:* public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto: >> public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] *On Behalf Of *Daniel Park >> *Sent:* lundi, 23. novembre 2009 12:39 >> *To:* public-media-annotation@w3.org >> *Subject:* Definition of subproperties and way forward >> >> >> Folks, >> >> >> We spent too much time for that issue both in Santa Clara and in mailing >> list. It's time to come up with a direction at this stage I believe. I >> (chair hat-on) don't have an objection with the summary below from Felix, >> also, that seems to us very reasonable way for the first step... >> >> >> Call for your opinion, any strong objection ? >> >> >> It will be also discussed finally at upcoming teleconf tomorrow. >> >> >> >> Daniel >> >> >> -- >> Soohong Daniel Park >> Samsung Electronics, DMC R&D >> http://sites.google.com/site/natpt00 >> >> [cut-and-paste] >> >> There seems to be one open question to me: Is it OK for us to start work >> on subproperties although we have not reached our goals even with the simple >> properties? IMO, we should first for all simple properties >> - define the API methods (done to some extend) >> - provide test cases and test suite material (not done at all) >> - run the tests with at least two implementations >> so that we can be sure to declare victory, even if we don't get to the sub >> property part. >> So I am saying not "no" about sub properties, but postpone work on them >> until we have done our basic job. >> >> Would you and others agree with that? >> >> Best, >> >> Felix >> >> > -- > _________________________________________________ > Dr. Tobias Bürger > > STI Innsbruck > University of Innsbruck, Austria > http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/ > tobias.buerger@sti2.at > __________________________________________________ > >Received on Monday, 23 November 2009 18:13:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:24:37 UTC