Le 11/11/2009 13:57, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : > If you make a convenience function *in addition* to all the functions > to access individual properties, you end up with more than one > function that has to be implemented, e.g. in every single Web browser. > That would be something that would be unacceptable to HTML. I can understand that, being not a big fan of redundancy myself. > Also, it > would stop being extensible. I don't see how, as soon as at least one function is extensible. But anyway, you made your point, and I agree with you. pa
Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2009 21:23:02 UTC