RE: Ontology for Media Entity 1.0 (ISAN)

Hi. Veronique.

 

I am sorry I don’t exactly understand the meaning of “in another section” you said.

IMO I guess if we decide to add ISAN to in-scope, we can reflect this to all part of ontology doc that are related with ISAN.

Because we will release just first draft for ontology doc.

But even if we decide to add this, the appropriate timing is not now but the second publication.

 

Anyway firstly we need to discuss about ISAN.

 

Best regards,

Wonsuk

 

From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Veronique Malaise
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 5:08 PM
To: Soohong Daniel Park
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: Ontology for Media Entity 1.0 (ISAN)

 

 

On May 14, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Soohong Daniel Park wrote:





In-scope format, isn’t it ISAN in-scope ?

I don't see this format in the mapping table; we keep all the formats from the mapping table as "in scope", if others should be taken into account in a later stage, we should list them and mention it in the document, but in another section. 

 

 

Best,

Véronique



 

 

-----

Soohong Daniel Park

Standard Architect, blog.naver.com/natpt

DMC Business, Samsung Electronics. KOREA

 

From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 이원석
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 7:20 PM
To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Ontology for Media Entity 1.0

 

Dear all,

 

[1] is the current version for Ontology doc.

Missing piece is the updated version of mapping table.

 

If you have any comments, please let me know.

 

[1] http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html


 

Best regards,

Wonsuk.